Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:34

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ana de Armas Is a Battle-Weary Ballerina - Jacobin
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Alzheimer's: Common insomnia treatment may prevent brain damage - Medical News Today
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What are the most shocking facts about the Bollywood industry?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Most people aren’t following this important dietary advice. Are you? - The Washington Post
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The Strait of Hormuz is a vital route for oil. Closing it could backfire on Iran - AP News
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What are the pros and cons of a prospective bride/groom not having any siblings?